UNITED NATIONS, (Tierramérica).- International policymakers are facing fierce criticism from the leaders of the world's 370 million indigenous peoples over plans to use carbon markets as one of the tools to mitigate climate change.

"It's a new way to make money," said Jihan Gearon of the U.S.-based Indigenous Environmental Network. "It has nothing to do with environmental concerns or indigenous peoples' rights."

Gearon and many others delegates to the Apr. 21-May 2 seventh annual meeting of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues fear that carbon markets will not only violate their rights, but also further aggravate the threat of pollution and climate change.

The so-called carbon markets reflect the commercial aspects of environmental responsibility, which allows companies to reduce emissions of climate changing greenhouse gases, like carbon, or buy the right to keep polluting.

Under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the UN Convention on Climate Change, the idea is that carbon markets offer an efficient system that will guide investments towards the emissions cuts that are the cheapest.

But like indigenous leaders, many independent experts dispute the notion that the market-driven approach can produce better and desirable results on greenhouse gas mitigation efforts.

A new study by the U.S.-based Institute for Policy Studies, published just a few days before the Forum meeting started, described the World Bank's role in the carbon markets as "dangerously counterproductive" to international efforts to tackle climate change. "It is making money off of causing the climate crisis and then turning around and claiming to solve it," charged Janet Redman, principal author of the report and an Institute researcher. The 79-page report, titled "World Bank: Climate Profiteer", argues that instead of encouraging clean energy investors, the bank is lending much of its financial support to the fossil fuel industry. "It's playing both sides of the climate crisis," said Redman, noting that in just past two years the bank loaned no less than 1.5 billion dollars to companies investing in fossil fuels. Out of its two-billion-dollar carbon finance portfolio, the Bank has directed nearly 80 percent to projects that involve polluting industries.

In her research, Redman also explains how the Bank's policy on carbon credits is affecting indigenous communities who have no voice or vote in reforestation projects where they live.

World Bank officials have officially acknowledged that indigenous peoples, who manage 11 percent of the world's forests and lands covering 80 percent of the world's territory, have "a small carbon footprint and that their contribution to global warming is minimal."

Yet, a World Bank document leaked in January suggests that it seeks to further expand its role in the carbon market with multi-billion-dollar plans for investment in so-called "climate adaptation" and forestry. In their critique of the World Bank's push for carbon markets, some indigenous leaders offer a different perspective.

"The concept of carbon markets is driven by an economic vision," Marcos Terena, an indigenous organizer from the Amazon region in Brazil, told Tierramérica.

"The indigenous vision of environmental issues is based upon spiritual thinking. The indigenous peoples respect Mother Earth. It's the governments and corporations that are responsible for environmental destruction," he added.

Egberto Tabo, coordinator general of COICA, an umbrella group representing hundreds of indigenous groups in South America's Amazon Basin, echoed the same in an interview with Tierramérica.

"The World Bank and corporations are exploiting our rainforests. The Bank and governmental frameworks on climate change are not taking into account our concerns," he said.

The UN Forum faces huge obstacles because states do not want to implement the Universal Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, adopted in 2007, Tabo added.

Despite drawing more than 3,000 delegates from nearly 500 indigenous groups, the Forum does not have the power to adopt obligatory resolutions. Indigenous leaders say they want both governments and private corporations to implement the declaration in its letter and spirit.

The 1992 UN Convention on Biological Diversity promotes and protects the right to indigenous peoples' ownership of their traditional knowledge, but the principle of "informed consent" for the use of indigenous lands is not part of its provisions.

In supporting the indigenous peoples' demand, the Convention's executive secretary, Ahmed Djoghlaf, said he would like to see the treaty being translated into "national laws and national actions." Forum chairperson Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, however, acknowledged that it would not be an easy task because some powerful nations, such as the United States and Canada, are reluctant to embrace it.

Some countries with large indigenous populations, such as Bolivia and Ecuador, on the other hand, seem willing to adopt the Declaration as part of their national laws.

Both Tabo and Terena describe such initiatives as early achievements of the global indigenous movement.

"This is time for the UN to learn from the cosmic vision of the indigenous peoples," said Terna. "It should know that life is not a commodity. It's not just humans. It's beyond that."